Bibliometric evaluation of individual researchers: not even right... not even wrong!
Europhysics News, 40 5 (2009) 26-29
Published online: 2009-10-17
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Towards establishing a research lineage via identification of significant citations
Tirthankar Ghosal, Piyush Tiwary, Robert Patton and Christopher StahlQuantitative Science Studies 2 (4) 1511 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00170
Towards Finding a Research Lineage Leveraging on Identification of Significant Citations
Tirthankar Ghosal and Muskaan SinghProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 58 (1) 456 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.478
Author-Suggested, Weighted Citation Index: A Novel Approach for Determining the Contribution of Individual Researchers
Tanmoy KonarPublications 9 (3) 30 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9030030
Assessing evaluation procedures for individual researchers: The case of the Italian National Scientific Qualification
Moreno MarzollaJournal of Informetrics 10 (2) 408 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.01.009
Incentives and Performance
Margit Osterloh and Alfred KieserIncentives and Performance 307 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_19
Quantitative analysis of the Italian National Scientific Qualification
Moreno MarzollaJournal of Informetrics 9 (2) 285 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.02.006
Bibliometrics as a tool to map uncharted territory: A study on non-professional interpreting
Aída Martínez-GómezPerspectives 23 (2) 205 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2015.1010550
Ranking Games
Margit Osterloh and Bruno S. FreyEvaluation Review 39 (1) 102 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X14524957
Predicting scientific success based on coauthorship networks
Emre Sarigöl, René Pfitzner, Ingo Scholtes, Antonios Garas and Frank SchweitzerEPJ Data Science 3 (1) (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-014-0009-x
An agent-based model for the bibliometric h-index
Georgia Ionescu and Bastien ChopardThe European Physical Journal B 86 (10) (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2013-40207-0
Reverse-engineering conference rankings: what does it take to make a reputable conference?
Peep Küngas, Siim Karus, Svitlana Vakulenko, et al.Scientometrics 96 (2) 651 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0938-8
Mimicry in science?
Lutz BornmannScientometrics 86 (1) 173 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0222-8
University Rankings
Lutz BornmannUniversity Rankings 145 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1116-7_8
Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance
Tobias Opthof and Loet LeydesdorffJournal of Informetrics 4 (3) 423 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.02.003
Citation graph, weighted impact factors and performance indices
Karol ŻyczkowskiScientometrics 85 (1) 301 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0208-6